Plauder-Thread rund ums Trading

      Ich habe ein Problem:

      Wenn ich die Tradesignal -1 hr - Kezen beobachte und es ist 13.30, und
      ich mache den Cursor auf die kerze , zeigt der mir dann "14 Uhr" Kerze an.

      Bei allen us.amerik. Chartprogrammen die ich probiert habe ist es so:
      Es ist jetzt 13.30 ich mache den Cursor auf die Kerze , und es wird mir
      "13 Uhr" Kerze angezeigt.

      Ist das einfach eine unterschiedliche Handhabung zwischen europäischen Charts und den amerikanischen?
      Bilder
      • 654567654554544.jpg

        86,61 kB, 600×592, 688 mal angesehen
      Euronext.liffe To Launch EuroMTS Government Bond Index Futures On 24 January 2007

      (21.12.06) - Euronext.liffe, the international derivatives business of Euronext, today announced that following successful completion of the legal contract specifications and related operating arrangements, the EuroMTS Government Bond Index Contracts will be launched on 24 January 2007.

      The new futures contracts will be available for trading on LIFFE CONNECT® and will comprise futures contracts on the following indices:

      1. EuroMTS Eurozone Government Broad Index (7 – 10 years)
      2. MTS Deutschland Government Index (7 – 10 years)
      3. MTS France Government Index (7 – 10 years)
      4. MTS Italy Government Index (7 – 10 years)

      These government bond index futures will allow investors to gain broad exposure for the first time to Eurozone government debt and to the individual country credits of France, Germany and Italy, on a single trading platform.

      Die Teile wurden gestern das erste Mal gehandelt, Volumen durchschnittlich 120 Kontrakte
      Die Welt der Hedge-Fonds zieht nicht nur renditehungrige Investoren an, sondern immer mehr Washingtoner Politikgrößen. Jüngstes Beispiel: Madeleine Albright, ehemals Außenministerin unter Präsident Bill Clinton. Sie hat jetzt einen eigenen Hedge-Fonds gestartet. Albright Capital Management LLC soll in Schwellenländer investieren und hat bereits mehr als 329 Mio. $ eingesammelt. Das Startgeld lieferte der niederländische Pensionsfonds PGGM, der 80 Mrd. Euro Altersruhegelder für Angestellte in Sozial- und Pflegeberufen verwaltet. "Albright Capital bietet eine einzigartige Gelegenheit, um Expertise in internationaler Politik mit professionellem Investment zu verbinden", lobt Else Bos, bei PGGM für die Anlage zuständig, das Engagement.

      Vergangene Woche wurde bekannt, dass auch Richard Breeden, der ehemalige Vorsitzende der US-Börsenaufsicht SEC, einen Hedge-Fonds gegründet hat. Breeden beaufsichtigte als Treuhänder den Telekomkonzern Worldcom nach dessen Pleite 2002. Nun will er von seinem Büro in Greenwich, der inoffziellen Hauptstadt der Hedge-Fonds, Aktionärsaktionismus als Anlagestrategie verfolgen. Breedens Fonds soll bald 1,25 Mrd. $ verwalten, zunächst sind es 500 Mio. $ - davon wurden ihm allein 400 Mio. $ von Calpers, dem kalifornischen Pensionsriesen, anvertraut.

      Albright und Breeden sind mit ihrer zweiten Karriere als Spekulanten nicht allein: John Snow, von Präsident George W. Bush vergangenes Jahr als Finanzminister abgesetzt, hat den Chairmanposten bei Cerberus Capital Management übernommen. Der Fonds, der 16,5 Mrd. $ verwaltet, ist erst kürzlich in Deutschland als Käufer von Gewerkschaftsimmobilien hauptsächlich in Ostdeutschland in Erscheinung getreten.

      Und Albrights Kabinettskollege und Snows Amtsvorgänger Lawrence Summers arbeitet seit Oktober beim Hedge-Fonds D. E. Shaw & Co - allerdings nur auf Teilzeitbasis.

      Hintergrund dieser Entwicklung ist die steigende Zahl von Pensionsfonds und Stiftungen, die mehr Geld in Hedge-Fonds anlegen wollen. Bis 2008 sollen allein US-Institutionen rund 300 Mrd. $ in Hedge-Fonds investiert haben, so eine Studie der Beraterfirma Casey, Quirk & Acito mit der Bank of New York. Der 208 Mrd. $ schwere Calpers-Fonds etwa hat bereits 2,7 Mrd. $ in Hedge-Fonds gesteckt und will noch auf 4 Mrd. $ erhöhen.

      Die ehemaligen politischen Schwergewichte genießen dabei offenbar einen Vertrauensvorschuss bei den Investoren. Sie gelten als erfahrene Türöffner. Der frühere US-Vizepräsident Dan Quayle, jetzt auch bei Cerberus in Diensten, beschrieb seine Aufgaben in einem Interview folgendermaßen: Er reise "quer durch die USA, Europa und Asien" und treffe "Investmentbankchefs, Unternehmen, Firmenaufkäufer, potenzielle Investoren und andere Geschäftsleute".

      Bei den Hedge-Fonds-Kollegen sind die Neuzugänge nicht beliebt. Mit bissigen Kommentaren wird deshalb an der Wall Street nicht gespart. "Diese Leute haben keinerlei Erfahrung mit Kapitalmanagment und bekommen auf Anhieb Hunderte Millionen anvertraut", sagt Phil Goldstein, der vor 14 Jahren einen Fonds namens Bulldog Investors gegründet hat und eine ähnliche Strategie verfolgt, wie sie Ex-SEC-Chef Breeden anwenden will. "Das ist so, als wenn ich vorschlage, finanziert mir doch eine Broadway-Show, weil ich unter der Dusche gerne singe."

      Aus der FTD vom 24.01.2007
      23.01.2007 | Pressemitteilung: MAN AG:

      MAN beendet Angebot vorzeitig und strebt freundliche Kombination mit Scania an

      Gespräche zwischen Volkswagen, Investor und MAN haben gezeigt, dass eine industrielle Logik in einem Zusammenschluss zwischen MAN AG, Scania AB und Volkswagen Heavy Trucks gesehen wird. Diese Kombination kann allerdings nicht mit dem gegenwärtigen MAN-Angebot für Scania erreicht werden, das am 31. Januar 2007 ausläuft und von Volkswagen und Investor abgelehnt wurde.



      Aus diesem Grund hat sich MAN entschieden, weder die Konditionen noch die Laufzeit dieses Angebotes zu verändern. Folglich wird MAN die Zustimmung der schwedischen Börsenaufsicht zur Rücknahme des Angebotes erbitten, da inzwischen sicher ist, dass die Angebotsbedingungen zum 31. Januar nicht erreicht werden können.



      Als Scania-Aktionär strebt MAN daher im Laufe dieses Jahres weitere Gespräche über eine freundliche Kombination von MAN AG, Scania AB und Volkswagen Heavy Trucks an.



      Gleichzeitig wird MAN sich weiterhin auf die Entwicklung der gegenwärtigen Geschäftsfelder konzentrieren und nach anderen Möglichkeiten suchen, um eine größere Effizienz durch Skaleneffekte zu erreichen und dadurch den Unternehmenswert für unsere Aktionäre zu erhöhen.
      Die neue Preispolitik der Futurebörsen - es wird von den Betreibern von Webseiten auch eine Gebühr für verzögerte Kurse verlangt - fordert das erste Opfer, weitere werden wohl folgen, es ist absehbar, dass zukünftig auch die verzögerten Daten für die User kostenpflichtig werden.


      Beginning at the end of August 2006, Chartbook.com has temporarily suspended the service for the Futures markets due to recent changes in the Exchange Fees required to display Futures Financial Data on our website. Because of this change in Exchange Fees, we are no longer able to financially continue service for the Futures market. We hope to one day continue service for the Futures market in the future.

      BUT ALL IS NOT LOST...
      In place of Futures, we now offer service for the FOREX market, which mimics almost identically to the Currencies in the Futures Market.

      PLUS...
      We are able to provide a real-time service for our charts vs the 30-minute delayed service we were offering with Futures. We will also soon provide a real-time Reports to help you locate markets on the move. This means if you trade currencies in the Futures Markets, your level of service has actually improved and we hope to continue to improve overall service as we grow.

      IN THE MEAN TIME...
      If you have relied on Chartbook.com for all of your Futures market needs, you will be happy to know that we do have a fantastic software package that can help your trading even more, Track 'n Trade Pro. If you would like to learn more, please contact us at either (800) 862-7193 during the weekdays and (800) 526-3019 during nights and weekends. You can also learn more at trackntrade.com

      We appreciate your patronage,

      The Chartbook.com Team



      Quelle: chartbook.com/info/futures.cgi

      Einen anderen Weg geht anscheinend die NYSE



      Börsen-Kurse für 100.000 Dollar im Monat

      Für 100.000 Dollar pro Monat will die New York Stock Exchange (Nyse) ihre Börsenkurse im Internet verkaufen. Der Konzern plant, anderen Internet-Unternehmen anzubieten, die Kurse in Echtzeit auf ihre Webseiten zu stellen. Ein entsprechender Antrag soll am Freitag bei der amerikanischen Börsenaufsicht SEC eingereicht werden, wie das "Wall Street Journal" berichtet.

      Das Interesse an einem solchen Angebot ist - trotz des stolzen Preises - groß.
      Dem Vernehmen nach haben bereits Google und der Nachrichtensender CNBC angekündigt, den Dienst kaufen zu wollen und ihren Nutzern dann kostenlos zur Verfügung zu stellen.

      Bisher meist zeitverzögert

      Bisher ist es für die breite Öffentlichkeit nur schwer möglich, an Echtzeit-Kurse zu kommen. Die Kurse, die die Börse interessierten Anlegern zur Verfügung stellt, sind meist 15 bis 20 Minuten zeitverzögert. Zudem wird bei einem Echtzeit-Feed genau überwacht, wer und wie viele Personen den Dienst nutzen - um dann pro Person abzurechnen.

      Ganz überzeugt von der neuen Strategie ist man bei der Nyse aber offenbar noch nicht. So soll das Programm für die Echtzeitkurse - sollte die SEC den Plan genehmigen - erstmal nur ein Jahr laufen, um es dann genau zu evaluieren.

      Letztlich kann sich die Nyse dieser Entwicklung nicht verschließen, da schon seit Jahren der größte Teil des Aktienhandels über Computer stattfindet und nicht mehr per Handzeichen und Zuruf auf dem Börsenparkett.


      Quelle: n24.de/wirtschaft_boerse/finan…leId=92779&teaserId=93553)

      China Life - IPO

      Heute stand das Börsendebüt
      des größten chinesischen Versicherers,
      China Life, im Blickpunkt. Das
      Debüt an der Börse Schanghai verlief
      fulminant – die Aktie kletterte im
      frühen Handel vom Ausgabepreis von
      18,88 auf bis zu 40,20 Yuan. Das Unternehmen
      hat beim Börsengang umgerechnet
      etwa 2,75 Milliarden Euro
      eingenommen.

      emissions-bank(en) haben da gute arbeit geleistet 8o
      Dinge die man hastig tut,
      bedauert man langsam.

      RE: Ute von der Lahr

      Hallo Dobi,

      anstatt den 13er SMA solltest du den 10er nehmen. Im 5 min Chart nimmt sie anstatt den 10er, den 13er und auch den EMA anstatt den SMA. Ich hatte den 5er einfach auf 15 min umgestellt, daher steht dort der 13er drin. Ich hoffe du kommst noch klar mit den ganzen ema's. ;)

      lg Stadinski
      New York, N.Y., January 3, 2007 — The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. announced today that it will offer its financially settled soft commodity futures contracts on the CME Globex electronic trading platform, beginning on January 7 for trade date January 8.

      The soft futures commodities include NYMEX cocoa, NYMEX coffee, NYMEX cotton, NYMEX FCOJ (frozen concentrated orange juice), NYMEX sugar #11, and NYMEX sugar #14. These futures contracts will continue to clear and trade on NYMEX ClearPort®. NYMEX will continue to waive trading, transaction, and clearing fees, as previously announced, through June 2007.

      orward Looking and Cautionary Statements
      This press release may contain forward–looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, with respect to our future performance, operating results, strategy, and other future events. Such statements generally include words such as could, can, anticipate, believe, expect, seek, pursue, and similar words and terms, in connection with any discussion of future results. Forward–looking statements involve a number of assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, any of which may cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated, estimated, or projected results referenced in forward–looking statements. In particular, the forward–looking statements of NYMEX Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries are subject to the following risks and uncertainties: the success and timing of new futures contracts and products; changes in political, economic, or industry conditions; the unfavorable resolution of material legal proceedings; the impact and timing of technological changes and the adequacy of intellectual property protection; the impact of legislative and regulatory actions, including without limitation, actions by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; and terrorist activities and international hostilities, which may affect the general economy as well as oil and other commodity markets. We assume no obligation to update or supplement our forward–looking statements.

      Source: NYMEX

      Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von „goso“ ()

      RE: Jeff Hughes

      Ich kann es jedem nur empfehlen es zu lesen. Leider weiß ich nicht, wie man den Artikel auf ein PDF Format bringt, um ihn dann zum Downloaden anzubieten. Sicher haben viele dei Zeitschrift nicht mehr

      hier im forum hat das irgend jemand mal mit einem link eingestellt, weiss aber nicht mehr, wer das war, der war aber in deutsch.
      ich hatte mir den auch abgespeichert,aber da er vom trader war, wurde die
      seite dann aktualisiert und der artikel war weg.
      @ stadinski
      Traders 04/06 den Bericht von Ute von der Lahr

      werde ich mir an sehen danke
      mfg dobi
      Es gibt Berge, über die man hinüber muß ,sonst geht der Weg nicht weiter

      Ute von der Lahr

      Hallo Dobi,

      schau dir mal im Traders 04/06 den Bericht von Ute von der Lahr an. Vielleicht kannst du dort noch etwas mehr erfahren und vielleicht noch einige Dinge mitnehmen, die bei Jeff nicht findest bzw. Jeffs System verbessern. Funktioniert prima, habe es durchgetestet. Hier ein Bild von Signalen von Ute von der Lahr.

      Viele Grüße Stadinski

      ps. sorry Dobi, meine Einzeichnungen vom FDAX Dec. 06 sind leider weg, weil der FDAX 03.07 nun aktuell ist und dort gab es leider bisher noch kein zeigenswertes Signal. Aber schau es dir selber mal an. Einfach und funktioniert. Meine Schlüsse habe ich daraus gezogen. Nicht geiz ist geil, nein: traden ist geil. ;)

      hier mal ein Trade aus dem DAX. Es gibt im FDAX aber mehr und bessere Signale.

      Durchbruch und Rückfall auf SMA's alle drei sind steigend. klasse Signal.
      Bilder
      • chart.png

        29,39 kB, 600×450, 854 mal angesehen

      Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 2 mal editiert, zuletzt von „Stadinski“ ()

      Jeff Hughes

      Hallo dobi und Döner trader,

      vielen Dank für den Artikel vom Traders 2004. Als ich euren Zeilen las, dachte ich Mooooment, die muß ich doch auch noch irgendwo haben. Als die Traders Zeitschrift vor lmir lag, habe ich gleich den Bericht gelesen. Sicher habe ich ihn vor zwei Jahren übergangen, weil ich mit dem Forexbereich noch nichts zu tun hatte.

      dobi ich kann verstehen, das du ihn dir jeden Tag auf dem Schreibtisch legst. Klasse, was er schreibt. Was ich sehr gut fand waren das er auch die letzten Hochs und Tiefs benutzt...

      Auf einem A0 Papier kopieren und mit Schriftgröße 20 in Büro hängen und immer wieder durchlesen.

      Ich kann es jedem nur empfehlen es zu lesen. Leider weiß ich nicht, wie man den Artikel auf ein PDF Format bringt, um ihn dann zum Downloaden anzubieten. Sicher haben viele dei Zeitschrift nicht mehr.

      Ich danke euch für den Hinweis, ich hätte es sonst nie wieder gelesen und wenn dann weiß ich nicht wann.

      viele Grüße Stadinski

      RE: Jeff Hughes

      @ dönertrader
      so ist es. seid das im trader erschien, habe ich das ding bestimmt 20 zig mal gelesen und es liegt immer oben auf dem schreibtisch.
      auch finde ich immer wieder was, was mich nachforschen lässt und ich habe sehr viel nutzen für mich daraus gezogen. ich weiss nicht genau was es ist ,aber
      ich konnte mich mit seinem stiel am besten identifizieren.
      die art, wie es geschrieben wurde gefiel mir und für mich ist das ding immer wieder vollgepackt mit ideen.
      mfg dobi
      Es gibt Berge, über die man hinüber muß ,sonst geht der Weg nicht weiter

      Jeff Hughes

      Wenn ich das internet durchstöbere treff ich immer wieder auf dieses Interview mit Jeff Hughes. Die Leute haben das bis zu 20 mal gelesen und behaupten sie finden immer wieder neue Aspekte darin. Also irgendwie ein Kultinterview.
      Jeff Du bist mein Hero!!!
      74 TRADERS´ December 2004
      people
      TRADERS´ Interview
      Jeff Hughes

      As seen in TRADERS´ Magazine, December 2004, German and English language issues.
      TRADERS´ 75

      also known asMr. Mom
      When Canadian Jeff Hughes got his foot in the
      door with one of Canada’s five major banks, he
      believed that he had found the job he was looking
      for. However, that turned out to be only partially
      correct. His interest in the markets was sparked
      later when he became licensed to sell mutual funds
      for the bank. That started Hughes on his path to
      becoming a full-time forex trader. Initially, in 1997,
      Hughes first started buying stock through a couple
      of accounts via the bank’s discount brokerage.
      He started to lightly buy and sell stock with a longterm
      time horizon. However, by 1999, when some
      of his technology stock picks churned out great
      returns, Hughes began to consider trading as a
      full-time career. Today, he trades full-time, while
      simultaneously caring for his 16-month old daughter.
      TRADERS´: What did you think of trading before you started
      in the business?

      HUGHES: I always thought that trading was something I wanted
      to know more about. Words that would come to mind about
      trading and traders would include gutsy, exciting, rewarding,
      entrepreneurial, and challenging. That is what I find it to be today,
      so my hunch was right.
      TRADERS´: What enticed you to start trading?
      HUGHES: By mid-1999 I was making more money per day on
      the stock market than at my job, and I found it very difficult to
      spend my non-work time on bank courses like I was supposed
      to. Instead, I was devoting every available free moment to
      studying my newfound success in trading stocks. In early April
      of 2000, I left the bank and began trading technology stocks
      full-time. In fact, I began trading full-time just weeks after what
      turned out to be the top of the Nasdaq’s amazing bull market run.
      TRADERS´: Did you find immediate success?
      HUGHES: Success at the beginning? Not really. I, of course,
      had made some incredible gains leading up to my decision to go
      full-time. But in the eight months that followed my move to fulltime
      trading, the Nasdaq fell around 2,500 points in about nine
      months, and I had made all my money in an upward trending
      market.
      TRADERS´: What was your account balance when you startedtrading?
      HUGHES: I commenced trading stocks back in 2000 with what
      I believed was a smaller account size than typical. A lot of people
      had large account sizes in 1999-2000 though. With regard to my
      forex trading, my beginning account size was small by any scale
      imaginable.
      TRADERS´: We’re curious about the details. How much money did you have in the account?
      HUGHES: This is laughable, but I actually opened my mini-forex
      account with $500. I traded the account to over $5,000 within four
      months, still a laughable figure of money. But I find I’ve been able
      to trade this and another small account I was able to build upon,
      and make regular withdrawals, as a partial sum of my income, on
      a monthly basis.
      I actually won the second account of $1,000 funded by
      Forex.com as one of the twelve finalists in their ‘Win a Mini
      contest.’ I have continued to trade this account along with my
      original. I, of course, still trade stock options at times.
      TRADERS´: Why did you start trading forex? What is so attractive about this market?
      HUGHES: I was intrigued by a number of things I was reading
      in trading magazines and websites about forex trading and the
      availability of forex trading accounts with minimal funds.
      A number of things were attractive, but I think reflecting now,
      that two main things enticed me to look closer. Firstly, the 24/7
      market hour structure, and secondly the amazing 200:1 or 100:1
      (depending on account type) margin available. I was also interested
      76 TRADERS´ December 2004
      F1) Trading platform
      FOREX.com’s trading platform, which features an integrated
      charting tool. Hughes uses a 5-minute chart with Fibonacci
      retracement and a 10-period and 40-period Exponential
      Moving Average (EMA) to identify entry/exit points.
      Source: forex.com
      in the ‘no commissions’ idea, and the fact that technical traders
      were finding that forex markets seemed to adhere more closely to
      technical indicators. My success on their demo bridged into success,
      (percent-wise, trading my mini account) and then of course
      Forex.com had their “Win a Mini” trading contest to win a Mini
      Cooper car. The next Forex.com “Win a MINI Trading Contest”
      starts in February 2005. Visit forex.com for more details.
      I qualified for that in February, the first of the four months
      the finalists were decided, and then was blown away when I won
      the car in June.
      I think traders around the world should welcome the 24-hour
      trading from Sunday evening to Friday evening. It allows me to
      be flexible with my schedule. And, of course, there is no extra
      calculation of varying commissions, only the spread. I don’t think
      the average equity investor realizes the potential return on
      investment power of the 100:1 or 200:1 margin available in the
      standard or mini-forex accounts. For instance, a mini account
      holder can buy or sell $100,000 of a currency with a mere $500.
      This position would only need to move 50 pips to earn a 100%
      return (but of course, the leverage works both ways).
      TRADERS´: Many traders who start with small accounts are
      blown out of the market in a few weeks or months. You started
      with a very small account and trade full-time now. Do you think
      that’s a feat that many traders can duplicate?

      HUGHES: I admit that my difficult experiences trading stocks
      and options had prepared me quite appropriately for the trading
      I do now. I don’t believe that trading a small account means failure
      in the forex markets by any means. The mini account can be
      opened with minimal funds and offers 200:1 margin. This really
      is an amazing combination of opportunities. After all, one of the
      main criteria for successfully making money is to use as little
      money or someone else’s money to make money. You just have
      to be willing to go to school.
      In other words, you need to learn the basics of trading. Try
      out your ideas on paper; try out a forex dealer/broker demo; open
      a mini account with minimal funds; trade small amounts, as little
      as 10,000 (one lot) per trade. Increase size slowly while size of
      capital increases. I think other traders can duplicate this. I have
      people asking me ‘how I do it,’ and it’s not something I can
      explain to someone over dinner, but what I do is something any
      trader can do.
      TRADERS´: What kind of trader are you?
      HUGHES: I consider myself to be a technical trader. Here’s why
      I think that. I trade mainly off of support and resistance levels,
      and trendlines. I buy and sell based on Moving Averages, Slow
      Stochastic, and Average Directional Index. I make my decisions
      based on candlestick charting patterns like inside days, doji, and
      shooting stars.
      That said, I think it’s prudent to be well aware of the
      fundamentals, where the broader trend is concerned anyway. I
      say this, because the forex markets focus so intently on a relatively
      small amount of economic data and interest rate decisions.
      Assessing changes in sentiment is just that much easier when
      you are at least aware of the data in addition to the chart patterns
      and indicators.
      TRADERS´: What is your most important technical tool and why?
      HUGHES: You are going to make me choose just one? I find
      that different time horizons can drastically affect how one might
      rank the importance of different technical indicators. On longerterm
      charts I have two have trend lines; I could not live without
      these.
      A long-term trendline that either holds or breaks can tend to
      indicate a dramatic shift in sentiment. On medium-term charts I
      cannot live without my support and resistance levels, my
      Fibonacci retracements, and my spikes high and low. Within the
      confines of the long- and short-term, the strength or weakness of
      support and resistance levels will decide the movements within
      the longer-term trend. On short-term charts I have to have my
      Moving Averages, as they have always been the best indicator
      for me where position entry or exit is concerned.
      TRADERS´: What are some of your concepts or trading ideas?
      HUGHES: I like to have three charts of the same currency up
      on my screens. I’ll have a daily chart up to ensure I am trading
      within the longer-term trend. I’ll have an hourly chart up which
      I’ll primarily use to make my trading decision and I’ll have a
      5-minute chart up to choose an entry/exit point. You have to be
      able to envision the trade unfolding beforehand. I glance up and
      instantly see:
      1. The price is above the 200-, 100-, and 50-period moving
      average on my daily chart and I know the longer-term
      trend.
      2. I look at my hourly chart and see the slow stochastic is in
      oversold territory, and that we are approaching a 50%
      Fibonacci retracement support level. I believe that FiboTRADERS
      ´ 77
      nacci retracements are very relevant in forex trading.
      3. I look at my 5-minute chart and see that my 10-period
      Exponential Moving Average has crossed above my
      40-period Smoothed Moving Average.
      I have tried all kinds of combinations and these are the ones
      that work for my eyes. I see what I want to see or not, in a matter
      of about 15 seconds.
      TRADERS´: Why do you think, that Fibonacci retracements
      are especially important?

      HUGHES: They are important because traders think they are
      important. It is absolutely amazing to me to watch traders
      worldwide buying and selling based on these Fibonacci
      retracement levels. But because they are respected and honoured
      by traders around the world, they are a self-fulfilling prophecy.
      They work because everyone is using them. I’m not a
      mathematician, but they are a remarkable appraisal of human
      nature built into a mathematical equation. It is human nature,
      after all, that after a move of selling and buying abates, that some
      will feel that it went too far.
      TRADERS´: How long are your typical trades?
      HUGHES: Typically my trades last one to three days. Of course
      this is contingent on whether they go my way or get stopped out. I’ll
      make a large number of 20-minute trades on a range-trading day,
      and I’ve held a trade in a trend for three to four weeks.
      TRADERS´: Are you a systematic trader?
      HUGHES: The term systematic implies that I follow a step-bystep
      procedure or make all my trades the same way, and I wouldn’t
      say that that is the case. What I would say is that my preparation
      is systematic. Due to my lifestyle I do a fairly large amount of
      preparation for my trades the night before or whenever I can. I
      flip through the charts, looking for charts at or heading towards
      a potential set up I like. I take note of all the Fibonacci retracement
      numbers. I take note of the tight ranges or inside days, which
      inevitably lead to a break out one way or the other. I always
      know when the economic data or decisions are coming out and
      will actually plan trades surrounding them at times.
      TRADERS´: How many hours do you work per day?
      HUGHES: It varies day-to-day, depending on how I appraise
      the markets that day and whether or not there is consolidation or
      movement. I try not to spend too much time trading if I don’t
      need to; because at the moment, this time could be spent with
      my daughter, teaching her, playing with her, encouraging her,
      etc. That said, she has to sleep sometime. I tend to trade a solid
      three to four hours in the daytime through her naps and at other
      times. Then I’ll trade another four hours or so after my wife gets
      home in the afternoon and before I go to bed. This is my routine
      from Sunday evening to Friday afternoon.
      TRADERS´: Where does discretion come in?
      HUGHES: Sometimes you have to be able to stand back and
      see that what’s going on is outside the bounds of normal. Whether
      it’s a breakout from a trading range or a fundamental shift in
      sentiment; this is where discretion comes into play. The bulk
      of your profits in any given month can be the result of how
      well you are able to let the winners run. Let’s face it; a lot of
      the time, we’re plucking profits out of a fairly small range-bound
      currency pair. Getting a nice entry and then managing that profit
      through a major move of 500-750 pips is like 15 to 20 nice
      range trades.
      TRADERS´: Is there something like the perfect system?
      HUGHES: I don’t think so, but who knows? Can a computer
      fully comprehend the emotions going on in the heads of millions
      of traders worldwide? Because I think a perfect system would
      have to be able to do this. The market is ever changing and
      evolving, so you’re constantly changing your own trading as you
      go along in order to adapt. It’s interesting to realize how much
      trading is like trying to survive. It’s really those who can adapt
      to varying market conditions who will be able to make a
      dependable living for any decent amount of time. I think traders
      go through periods where their systems work close to perfectly;
      and of course, you can start to think that nothing could go wrong
      and then, oops. The successful traders are the ones who adapt
      during the times their system is failing.
      TRADERS´: Do you mix timeframes?
      HUGHES: Yes, in fact I think this is really the best way to see
      the whole picture clearly.
      TRADERS´: Do you work more with indicators or patterns?
      HUGHES: I tend to gravitate to the chart patterns, but I seem to
      have more success with the indicators at times, and I find
      combining both to be the best of all. As long as you understand
      what you’re looking at, then why not use every tool you possess
      to tilt the risk in your favour.
      TRADERS´: Does volume play a role in your trading approach?
      HUGHES: That’s an interesting question where forex is
      concerned because there is no direct contract volume associated
      with forex. But generally I believe volume is a very important
      aspect of trading. You should really know the following about
      volume: increasing volume with an increasing price translates to
      potential for a move higher; increasing volume with a decreasing
      price translates to potential for a move lower; decreasing volume
      with an increasing price translates into a potential slowing of the
      trend, and a possible reversal or retracement. Decreasing volume
      with a decreasing price translates into a potential slowing of the
      trend, and a possible reversal or retracement. There is a way to
      monitor volume in forex using certain charting programs, a
      volume histogram, but I don’t use it.
      However, in the evenings when I’m able to watch the markets
      closely, I can see the volume actually pick up in the movement
      of a chart and this is something I use.
      TRADERS´: How do you test your trading ideas?
      HUGHES: I test trading ideas all the time using smaller lots.
      Sometimes something will come along that works and it will be
      78 TRADERS´ December 2004
      F2) Hughes’ charts
      Two additional charts often used by Jeff Hughes, a
      60-minute chart with a slow stochastic that he uses to make
      his trading decisions, and a daily chart showing a 200-,
      100-, and 50-period EMA. Hughes refers to the daily chart to
      make sure his trades are in line with the longer-term trend.
      successful right away. But it will keep me awake at night, so I try
      to tweak it so I can live with it. It’s an interesting question and a
      dilemma that traders deal with. You have to be willing to learn,
      because there is no such thing as a perfect trader. We all know
      that in any given trading day, numerous opportunities exist that
      we miss.
      TRADERS´: Are you still looking for new set-ups?
      HUGHES: Yes, I am always looking for new set-ups. The market
      is an ever-evolving creature that requires you to be versatile and
      adaptable.
      TRADERS´: How do you find them?
      HUGHES: You have to be willing to take the time and observe.
      I have pages and pages of notes, if something happens I write it
      down. If I miss a trade, I write down what happened. If a trade
      gets stopped out, I write down my best approximation of why it
      did so. If a trade does better than I thought it would, or better
      than it deserved to, I make notes of the circumstances. At the end
      of a day, I could have 10 pages of scribbled notes, which I try to
      decipher during my evening of preparation for the next day.
      Ironically, what really works for me is the fact that I don’t have
      the luxury of an uninterrupted day to trade, and that I must prepare
      much more than most would need to.
      TRADERS´: How many different set-ups do you use for your
      trading?

      HUGHES: I use any number of set-ups or combinations of them.
      I love to play reversals; I’ve always been a devil’s advocate. I’ll
      make note of a bullish engulfing pattern on my candlestick charts,
      and the potential for the pattern to be confirmed. I’ll have
      noted the nearby support and resistance levels (whether they are
      Fibonacci retracement levels, trendlines, or previous reaction
      lows/highs). I’ll watch for oversold/overbought readings on Relative
      Strength Index or Slow Stochastic and look for positive
      divergences.
      I’ll see signs of buying pressure coming in. That is the volume
      I was speaking of. We’re talking about a pretty compelling signal
      for a reversal, and the thing is, you can see these set-ups all the
      time, sometimes just a very short-term reversal on a 5-minute
      chart, and sometimes a major change in trend on the daily chart.
      I take my profits however I can get them.
      I rather like to make a trade on a 50% retracement of a large
      move if the 200-day moving average is providing support or
      resistance in that area. I find that the 20- and the 80-pip levels
      seem to act as support and resistance levels more often and seem
      to be good places to initiate trades or take profits.
      TRADERS´: How do you manage your risk?
      HUGHES: Of course, I manage my risk by using stops, but it’s
      really all about the work I do the night before. There are potential
      trade set-ups that are just less risky. You have to do everything
      in your power to tilt the odds in your favour. My lifestyle of
      being a Dad/trader requires that I do the trading work the night
      before, and that I be aware of what each day may present to
      me. As I already mentioned, I make notes of support and
      resistance levels. My charts are a kaleidoscope of lines that I’ve
      put in the night before showing trendlines, Fibonacci retracement
      levels, previous lows, etc.
      I’m aware of what data is coming out the next day and when,
      and will program reminders on my Ipaq pocket PC, or even just
      write them down on my next day’s worksheet. I adjust my various
      computers to the charts I expect to follow closely the next day;
      some of my charts are smaller than others, based on what currency
      pairs are doing interesting things. These are all things that reduce
      the risk I take in every trade. Being prepared and the careful
      usage of hard and trailing stops makes my day as a trader and a
      Dad possible.
      TRADERS´: So, your stops are based more on technical issues
      than on money management, correct?

      HUGHES: Perhaps, but I would say they are based on both. My
      stops will usually be set up on technical support and resistance
      levels, rather than say a set number of pips. The set number of
      pips just doesn’t make sense to me, and so I believe that basing
      stops on technical support and resistance levels is just smart
      money management. Setting up a stop for a set number of pips
      is ignoring the fact that there is no basis for your trade to work.
      The pair may just be cycling up and down a little more than
      usual, and you’ve stopped yourself out for no technical or
      fundamental reason.
      TRADERS´: How do you determine when you are wrong in a
      trade?

      HUGHES: Wrong trades are usually determined on their own.
      Proper use of stops takes this decision off of your shoulders.
      There are times when I will remove a stop if I feel that I’ve missed
      something in my preparation.
      TRADERS´ 79
      However, I just want to go on to something else, because I
      trust my preparation, and I know that there is another trade setting
      up somewhere else. Sometimes you have to step in if you can
      see it’s not acting right, and if that’s the case, then I will pull the
      plug before we even get to the stop.
      TRADERS´: Is money management an independent topic?
      HUGHES: Money management is an integral part of trading. You
      need to know one thing if you are beginning to trade or thinking
      about it: all traders lose money; it’s part of the business of trading.
      Approximately 95% of traders lose money during their first year
      in the markets. It is the management of losses that determines
      whether you can make a living at it. It is absolutely vital to protect
      your capital. It’s like a gunfight, and you just want to live to fight
      another day.
      Until you have at least a few years under your belt, and you
      can read a chart in a 5- to 10-second glance, you should be leaning
      towards the conservative side of things and getting out of trades if
      there is any technical or fundamental reason to do so.
      TRADERS´: How much of your equity do you risk per trade?
      HUGHES: I risk about 5% per trade. This can vary in the 2.5%-
      7.5% range. I will adjust the percentage based on how the trade
      suits my risk criteria and where we are within the short-, medium-,
      or longer-term trend.
      TRADERS´: How do you manage your open trades?
      HUGHES: I peel in and out of trades. I raise or lower stops
      to breakeven if they go my way. I take half the profits at pivotal
      support/resistance points in the move and let the other half run
      with a trailing stop. I ease into or out of a position with one-fourth
      of that position and then another one-fourth as I see a trade set
      up potentially beginning or ending. I trade two separate
      accounts, and try to let a nice entry ride within a larger trend,
      while I trade the same pairing up and down as it cycles within
      the longer-term trend.
      This is another simple way I can keep things straight in my
      mind. Some of my ideas are quite simplistic, but they are this
      way for a reason. All I do as a trader and all I aspire to achieve in
      any given trading day really have to come second after my
      daughter.
      This is the right question to answer with an explanation of
      my computer set-up, because I use the latest technology to
      effectively manage my open trades. I have a pair of monitors on
      a P4 computer on the main floor of my home, and the same on
      the lower level of my home. I have a wireless-G network that
      basically makes my home a high-speed wifi hotspot. That allows
      me to use my Ipaq pocket PC to trade or check rate
      quotes anywhere in the house. If I feel that I cannot properly
      interact or care for my daughter, I put my Ipaq into its holster
      case attached to my belt and keep tabs on things from wherever
      we need to be around the house. I can see my monitors from
      about 70% of the house. When my daughter and I go out, I tend
      to lighten up positions; and I carry my Ipaq with me and switch
      to my Wireless GPRS modem.
      It’s a juggling act, and obviously I’m a Dad first and
      foremost, so sometimes I close up shop and I’m just a Dad. But
      it’s remarkable how I find that I can be a high calibre Dad and
      a high calibre trader through the use of these tools I have at my
      disposal.
      TRADERS´: What kind of stops and/or profit targets do you
      use?

      HUGHES: I use hard stops and trailing stops on trades. The
      difference between successful and unsuccessful trading is the
      usage of stops. Enter a hard stop as your trade is initiated. Run a
      real or mental trailing stop when they go your way. Keep a tighter
      trailing stop in a range and try to give more space for the trending
      stop.
      I tend to use a flexible profit target. I have a target in mind
      but I also know that it’s how well you let the winner’s run that
      will determine your overall profitability. I won’t have an order
      entered to close the trade, except under odd circumstances. I
      monitor with alerts and make a judgement call on whether I think
      the move will take a rest before it resumes or reverses. When
      setting a trailing stop, it has to be a compromised distance between
      how much you are willing to give back and how much wiggle
      room you can live with, so that it will keep you in a trending
      trade.
      TRADERS´: In terms of executing trades, is that a subjective
      process or do you do that mechanically?

      HUGHES: Interesting question, and at first I believed myself to
      be executing trades subjectively. My preparation is mechanical.
      This can vary in my trading as much as my days can vary in how
      they play out. My lifestyle requires that I be prepared. I need to
      know where a currency becomes interesting to me, and then I
      examine how or why we got to this place in order to make a final
      decision; but perhaps as many as half of my trades are purely
      mechanical in nature, due to the very nature of my lifestyle. I’ve
      done the work; I can see at a glance the price action and the
      chart, so I make the trade.
      TRADERS´: What is the relation between your winning and
      losing trades?

      HUGHES: They all start the same way, right? They are either
      going to go up or down eventually, and that’s all they should
      have in common. If it doesn’t go your way, get out. Your time
      and capital are better spent on the next set-up. In fact, the trade
      that went against you can set up into a great trade revisited
      minutes, hours, or days later.
      TRADERS´: What was your worst drawdown?
      HUGHES: I had some tough knocks right off the bat. I began
      trading full-time just weeks after what turned out to be the 5,000
      top of the Nasdaq. Before forex, I traded primarily options and
      once, early on, I really piled into a call with only a few days until
      expiration and lost most of my investment. I had a number of
      bad trades right away in April of 2000, as I thought stocks only
      went up.
      Just kidding, but you know what? Psychologically, I sent all
      80 TRADERS´ December 2004
      those memories packing, otherwise I wouldn’t have made it to
      this point. I have not really had any terrible drawdowns in my
      forex trading, but then again, I learned enough valuable lessons
      before I got here to actually avoid those pitfalls.
      TRADERS´: What do you find most frustrating about trading?
      HUGHES: The most frustrating aspect of trading for me is
      preparing for the possibility of a set-up the night before and then
      watch the set-up evolve, but then miss it. The work of finding
      the possibility of the great trading set-up the night before is most
      of the trade for me. So not being there right at the optimal entry
      can be frustrating. That said, my daughter comes first, and she is
      an amazing little girl who inspires me to keep going even on the
      toughest days.
      TRADERS´: When did you realise that trading wasn’t going to be just an attempt in the markets, but was going to be a full-time
      career for you? Or did you sense that from the beginning?

      HUGHES: When I first started, I thought, ‘this is what I am
      going to do.’ Then, when it became difficult right away and
      what I’d been doing before the bear market didn’t work
      anymore, I had to do some soul searching. I had to step back,
      try different things, and reduce my trading size drastically. When
      I started to make fairly consistent profits in the middle of the
      worst of bear markets, that’s when I began to feel it was
      something I could do. However, my recent trading success in
      the forex markets has brought my confidence and determination
      to a whole new level, where it is not a matter of knowing that I
      can do it, but rather how can I do it better. Trading is dramatically
      about confidence; and it will be shaken from time to time.
      However, if you hold on through the tough times, you will reap
      the rewards. Write it all down and learn from it.
      TRADERS´: Where does the psychological element come into
      play?

      HUGHES: It’s all about the battle with yourself. Really knowing
      this is one of the big steps in becoming successful at trading.
      Once you realise this, I mean really realise this, then you learn to
      step back and not to make those hasty, emotional, unplanned
      trades that inevitably turn to losses.
      TRADERS´: Any words about fear, greed and self-esteem?
      HUGHES: Every trader must deal with fear and greed. You have
      to know that trading is not a get-rich-quick scheme. It’s a business,
      and you are all levels of the company in one: manufacturing,
      accounting, information and technology systems, CEO, etc. Losses
      are the expenses of the business. The markets move on fear and
      greed: fear of missing a run, or fear of missing out on a possible
      trade, or fear of losing money. Greed can be worse, as it will not
      only get you into the markets ill-advised, it will cause you to
      turn a profitable trade into a hard-to-digest loss.
      TRADERS´: What do think is the difference between you and
      so many other traders who tried and failed?

      HUGHES: Persistence. I kept trying new set-ups and new
      markets until I found my niche. I stayed conservative with the
      size of my trades until I could see a trend of positive results. The
      most important element of all is a rock solid support system. My
      wife, Claire, has been patient and believing when there were
      shadows of doubt and misgivings from most of those around
      me. That is a necessity in this tough, challenging business.
      TRADERS´: Aside from zipping around in your new Mini, how
      do you enjoy your free time?

      HUGHES: Trading is a lifestyle that can suck you in, so I try to
      balance that by gravitating to challenging leisure time activities
      (both mental and physical), like regular work-outs or playing
      the guitar; things that require concentration. But mostly I just
      like to get away for a day of fun with my wife and daughter.
      TRADERS´
      Bilder
      • jeff hughes.jpg

        124,98 kB, 1.496×479, 990 mal angesehen